How To Get More Players On Your Ark Server

Noah's Ark Discovered ... Once more and Again

In this world there are things that seem on the verge of beingness discovered every so ofttimes, yet never quite materialize. The "Lost City" of Atlantis, for example, has been "found" at to the lowest degree a one-half dozen times. One researcher is pretty sure it is in Bolivia; another says it is Antarctica; a third claims that Bimini beachrock may exist from the lost culture.

Then it is with Noah'due south Ark.

The difference is, of class, that the implications of Noah'southward Ark actually beingness institute extend far across archaeology. The weight of all the paired animals in the world is nothing compared to the religious freight that the Ark carries.

The Ark story is scientifically implausible; there only wouldn't be enough space on the boat to adjust 2 of every living animal (including dinosaurs), along with the food and water necessary to keep them alive. Furthermore, amalgam a vessel of that scale would take hundreds of workers months to complete. Nonetheless, Biblical literalists—those who believe that proof of the Bible'southward events remains to be found—have spent lives and fortunes trying to validate their beliefs.

The search goes on

Earlier discussing the recent claims regarding the whereabouts of Noah's vessel, a history of Ark "finds" is instructive.

Violet M. Cummings is the author of several books on Noah'southward Ark, amongst them "Noah'southward Ark: Fable or Fact?" (1975), in which she claimed that Noah's Ark was institute on Turkey's Mount Ararat. Co-ordinate to the 1976 volume and film "In Search of Noah'southward Ark," "in that location is now actual photographic evidence that Noah's Ark really does exist.... Scientists have used satellites, computers, and powerful cameras to pinpoint the Ark's exact location on Mt. Ararat."

This is a rather remarkable claim, for despite repeated trips to Mt. Ararat over the by thirty years, the Ark remains elusive.

Undeterred by a lack of show, in 1982 Cummings issued a book titled, "Has Everyone Really Seen Noah'southward Ark?," published past Creation-Life Publishers. The subtitle, "An Affirmative Definitive Report," hints at Cummings'south determination.

Interest in Noah'southward Ark resurfaced in Feb 1993, when CBS aired a two-hour primetime special titled, "The Incredible Discovery of Noah'due south Ark." (Little did CBS know that they were using incredible in its accurate, proper significant: "not credible.")

As Ken Feder describes in his book "Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries," the special "was a hodgepodge of unverifiable stories and misrepresentations of the paleontological, archaeological, and historical records." It included the riveting testimony of a George Jammal, who claimed not simply to have personally seen the Ark on Ararat simply recovered a piece of it. Jammal'due south story (and the clamper of wood he displayed) impressed both CBS producers and viewers. However he was after revealed equally a paid actor who had never been to Turkey and whose piece of the Ark was not an unknown ancient timber (identified in the Bible as "gopher woods") but instead modernistic pine soaked in soy sauce and artificially aged in an oven.

Red-faced CBS, which had done little fact-checking for their much-hyped special, said that the program was amusement, not a documentary.

Contempo claims

More claims surfaced periodically, including in March 2006, when a LiveScience writer reported on nonetheless another incarnation of the Ararat claim. A team of researchers establish a rock formation that might resemble a huge ark, nearly covered in glacial ice. Little came of that claim but a few months afterwards, in June, a team of archaeologists from the Bible Archæology Search and Exploration (Base) Institute, a Christian organization, found yet another rock formation that might be Noah's Ark.

This time the Ark was "found" not on Ararat but at thirteen,000 feet in the Elburz mountains of Islamic republic of iran. "I tin can't imagine what it could exist if information technology is not the Ark," said squad member Arch Bonnema. They brought dorsum pieces of rock they claim may be petrified wood beams, likewise as video footage of the rocky cliffs.

The team believes that, within the rock germination, they tin see evidence of hundreds of massive hand-hewn wooden beams laid out in the presumed size and shape of the Ark.

The Biblical archaeologists seem to have experienced pareidolia; seeing what they desire to run across in ambiguous patterns or images. Merely every bit religious people will see images of Jesus or the Virgin Mary in toast, stains, or clouds, they may also see images of Noah's Ark in rock cliffs. (In New Mexico's Sandia National Forest in that location is a large rock formation chosen Battleship Stone, which—from a certain angle—does indeed look like a battleship. One wonders what the Base team would make of that.)

Other researchers remain certain that the Ark is in fact on Mt. Ararat. Noah's Ark enthusiasts are therefore in the somewhat awkward position of deciding which (if whatsoever) of several scientifically "definitive" Ark finds is the existent i.

The Base claims, as with all previous reports of finding the Ark, take yet to be proven. Ultimately, information technology may non matter, considering, as Base president Bob Cornuke states, "I estimate what my wife says my business is, nosotros sell hope. Promise that it could be true, promise that there is a God."

Even so the question is not near faith, promise, or God; the question is if Noah's Ark is existent and has been establish. Like Atlantis, the ever-elusive Ark will continue to be "found" by those looking for information technology—whether it exists or not.

Benjamin Radford is Managing Editor of the Skeptical Inquirer magazine and is author of three books and hundreds of articles. His Web site is www.RadfordBooks.com.

The Biggest Pop Myths
Claimed Discovery of Atlantis Called 'Completely Bogus'
Jesus Could Have Walked on Ice, Scientist Says
Urban Legends Debunked

Benjamin Radford is the Bad Scientific discipline columnist for Alive Science. He covers pseudoscience, psychology, urban legends and the science behind "unexplained" or mysterious phenomenon. Ben has a master'southward degree in education and a bachelor's caste in psychology. He is deputy editor of Skeptical Inquirer science mag and has written, edited or contributed to more than xx books, including "Scientific Paranormal Investigation: How to Solve Unexplained Mysteries," "Tracking the Chupacabra: The Vampire Fauna in Fact, Fiction, and Folklore" and "Investigating Ghosts: The Scientific Search for Spirits," out in autumn 2017. His website is www.BenjaminRadford.com.